2 million self-employed
Their interests are our interest
It's your contract: Take control of it!
We say you should control your contract. Here's how. Check for clauses that are:
Red for Stop
Amber for Caution
Green for Go
You can also make use of our Contract Template to design your contract.

Matrixes and template are available here (ICA members only). Not a member? Join here for as little as $55.
You and Your Contract
Charter of Contractual Fairness.

Debate: Suck it up?

Contract problems?
Fixing business disputes
There's lots happening for new dispute resolution services for small business people. The Small Business Commissioner (SBC) model is being rolled out across Australia. Explanation of developments.
Watching: The new world of work
We track and discuss what's happening with work.
The new Cuban revolution.
Watching: The coordinated attack against self-employed in Australia
Do unions hate the self-employed?
Federal tax attack
Sham contracting small problem
Watching: New Technology
Opportunities and new threats for self-employed people
Left versus right: the great debate
Ken Phillips (ICA) and Peter Strong (COSBOA) debate "The Future (or Death) of Employment". Vids are here.
Our Campaigning
We need unfair contract protections
Defend contractor tax laws
Watching: Your Super
We're monitoring superannuation
Watching: Work Safety Laws
Harmonised laws have big problems.
Watching: Government Contracts
Military Aircraft (JSF)

National Broadband Network
Watching: Fair Work Act
We're watching

What the AIG wants
Handy ATO Links
Filing your tax return:
A member's problem
ATO advice

Handy ATO tax links:
ATO debt collection: overview
ATO debt collection: 'Products'
Guide to managing your debt
Not-for-profit tax guide
Lodge your BAS online
PAYG withholding tax tables
New tax form: Taxpayer Statement of Account
New tax form: Notice of Assessment
Mortgage scams
Small business support
Payment arrangement calculator
Want an ATO visit?
ATO Help for small business
ABN eligibility rules
Self managing your tax debt

Handy Super links:
ATO SMSF compliance
ATO free seminars.
SMSF Admin advice
New Super clearing house
Tax on SMSF loans
Watching Global Economies
Watching Global Economies
Watching the USA
Watching China
Central Banks on Debt
Watching Housing Bubbles
Ken Phillips on the debt equation

In the headlights of an IR collision


22 December 2011

When trying to keep up with the multiple agendas of the Gillard government, it's easy to 'fall asleep at the wheel' and miss seeing a semi-trailer about to hit. In the latest industrial relations development, that's metaphorically what's about to happen.

In the last parliamentary sitting week for the year, the government laid on the table a new bill that seeks to control the price of trucking across the nation. The consequence of the passing of the bill will be a significant increase in the cost of road transport, a decline in productivity in the sector, lower incomes for truck drivers and a huge power grab by the Transport Workers Union.

For the TWU, this is an expanded agenda on the power grab they tried at Qantas. That is, at Qantas, the TWU showed they were seeking to control management decisions. With this new Gillard government bill, the TWU seeks to control road transport across Australia. Further, the bill lays out a template by which unions, through industrial relations tribunals, can control and fix prices under commercial contracts.

The bill, the Road Safety Remuneration Bill 2011 does this under the pretence of improving road safety. The government's line is one promoted by the TWU for a long time; they argue that the operation of a competitive commercial market in trucking forces down pay rates and puts truck drivers under pressure to speed, take drugs and break road laws.

Under this reasoning, the blame for any illegal and dangerous driving by truck drivers lies not with individuals who break the law, but with the people who pay them. The TWU and Gillard government have been active in commissioning and producing reports that substantiate this claim.

Their 'solution' in this bill is to create a new tribunal, effectively administered by Fair Work Australia, that will set 'safe' rates for drivers. Apparently by setting income rates under commercial trucking contracts, truck drivers won't break the law.

For example, early this year the courts supported Cootes Transport Group after they sacked a fuel truck driver for repeatedly using his mobile phone while driving. The court said the driver had engaged in 'gross and wilful' misconduct that endangered the public with potential 'disastrous consequences.' Supposedly the government and the TWU must be arguing that had 'safe rates' been applied, the driver would not have behaved in this dangerous manner.

This line of argument, however, is itself either deeply dangerous or a mask for a different agenda. I reason there's a different agenda.

Rates for drivers who are employees are already controlled by FWA under awards and enterprise agreements. If there was any sense to the government/TWU argument, provisions could have been made under the existing workplace laws covering employees. They have not done this.

Instead, the new bill is squarely aimed at capturing self-employed owner drivers, the thousands of small business people operating their own trucks. These people are not within the jurisdictional reach of the TWU. In New South Wales, however, they are.

The NSW TWU has for a long time been the statutory policeman under unique laws that give the NSW industrial relations commission control of commercial trucking rates. It seems to be a form of price fixing and would appear to breach competition laws.

Drivers suffer under this regime because the laws send driver incomes south. A feature of the NSW model is that companies that engage drivers must boost bad drivers' incomes by taking work from good drivers. Productivity drops. Truck drivers' incomes drop but costs go up. Go figure!

The head of the TWU, Tony Sheldon, emailed federal MPs imploring them to support the bill on safety grounds. I've replied to MPs cautioning them on its implications, and in a more detailed analysis I've explained why the bill is deficient.

There's a lot at stake. The bill creates monopolised control of prices in a vital free market sector. National productivity will suffer. It fits a broader pattern. Through legislative pandering to vested interests, the wealth-generating ability of our nation is being eroded.


From the Business Spectator, December 2011.



Send us a Comment

To send us a comment on this story, click here.